I think in reality, Jane Smith would be a grad student who has a deep enough understanding of math to write a lucid essay. The problem with a non-math clerical

I think in reality, Jane Smith would be a grad student who has a deep enough understanding of math to write a lucid essay. The problem with a non-math clerical person or AI writing about a technical topic is the same problem clickbait science journalism has. They wildly misunderstand things, and sometimes even a single poor choice of words leads to completely false statements. If there's a real truth being communicated, especially a new frontier paper not in any training set, then A.I. is going to just deteriorate the accuracy by fluffing it up with hallucinated mumbo jumbo. I use A.I. in my writing all the time, but I do it the right way. I make a list of the real truths and arguments I want to make, I read the A.I.s essay, I grab the snippets I like, then I dictate vocally an essay on the fly, while skimming the snippets for the talking points. Then maybe I do that loop again to refine. A.I. is a chatty, weird talking coworker on drugs who you bounce ideas off, it's not a genius you can directly plagiarise from.