1. A majority of shareholders voted for the original pay deal. They deserve to have their vote respected 2. I don't judge company strategy based on statements

1. A majority of shareholders voted for the original pay deal. They deserve to have their vote respected 2. I don't judge company strategy based on statements by disgruntled ex-employees. It would be naive to do so. 3. Things Musk says in shareholder meetings are SEC audited. So if he says the Model 2 is coming, it will come. 4. The Tesla Supercharger network is great. But it's not a competitive advantage as it's open to other brands. 5. As I said, compare the number of BEVs sold and the margins, whether we're looking at startups or legacy auto. Come back to me when you've found one that comes close to Tesla in Q1 2024 sales and margins. 6. You're arguing in bad faith. As I said, the carbon-wrapped motor is just one example of innovation, and the Model 3 Highland is just one example of product improvement. Your point was that Tesla "failed" to improve their products. That point is easily disproven. 7. X.com is not filled with bots and Nazis in my experience. If it was, I wouldn't use it. What data do you base your argument on? 8. Eberhard hadn't sold a single production vehicle at Tesla. Elon Musk was co-founder, chairman, product architect and the main source of funding when Roadster (Tesla's first car) was designed and produced. He oversaw the design of the Roadster from the beginning. Musk won the Global Green 2006 product design award and the 2007 Index Design award for the design of the Roadster. Not Eberhard. Musk. Production of the Roadster started in 2008, a year after Eberhard had been replaced at Tesla. --- Let's not accuse each other of being "delusional" - let's learn from each other and contribute to a healthy conversation.