Sound like "use AI" is morally equivalent to "use a not-so-good secretary or translator". (I don't know the 1949 standards for crediting translators of researc

Sound like "use AI" is morally equivalent to "use a not-so-good secretary or translator". (I don't know the 1949 standards for crediting translators of research papers - but I'd bet that 99% of the blame for poor translation, by someone he'd specifically hired for the task, would fall on the Professor.) Rather than all the hype and panic about "AI-written Research Papers!", it seems far more reasonable to say "We'll treat you having an AI write your paper the same as you having your kid sister write your paper - responsibility and blame are 100% on you. Maybe with some extra helpings of humiliation and contempt, if it turns out that your kid sister wasn't qualified, and you failed to realize that and fix everything." But, back in the real world - hype and panic generate loads of lucrative clicks. So I'm not expecting intelligent policies any time soon.