5 ms·
The original one is better, but the font for your links is extremely malformed in my Chrome for some reason. Except from that I prefer it, it is less conformin
by shane_armstrong 14y ago
The original one is better, but the font for your links is extremely malformed in my Chrome for some reason.
Except from that I prefer it, it is less conforming and therefore will stick in my mind for longer, I actually read some of the text on your site, which is more than I usually did.
Tell your client the marketing team suggested that design so that they have a reason to be paid and that any marketing team is actually useless in most cases. Paying someone to tell you your own opinion is a bad method of outsourcing.
- usaphp 14y agoHi Shane, thank you very much for you feedback, i really appreciate it. I totally agree with you. p.s. what version of Chrome are you using?
- shane_armstrong 14y ago12.0.742.112 And you are most welcome, also, your top links "blog" anchor seems to be miss-placed.
- usaphp 14y agothanks :) Will investigate on it right now. This is how it looks for me btw: http://bit.ly/JiazUb http://bit.ly/JiazUb
- shane_armstrong 14y agohttp://i48.tinypic.com/17eh3p.png http://i48.tinypic.com/17eh3p.png That is the view on my screen, a quick analysis of your page source shows that the container has a fixed width of 700px, but that the computed style is returning a total of 702px for all the contents of the spans. This may be because your font size is forcing the containers to expand ever so slightly, try a 0.9em size compared to your general font size to see if this fixes the issue.
- usaphp 14y agofonts are probably messed up on windows :) Thank you Shane for the feedback and for the time you spent to respond. I will just use a regular font instead...Still cant change a clients opinion :) she still likes the other one more ... dont have enought responds here :(