3 ms·
Maybe not planned as a barrier, but effectively being one now? So this could be a reason why not to revert it.
by red_trumpet 2y ago
Maybe not planned as a barrier, but effectively being one now? So this could be a reason why not to revert it.
- throwaway4good 2y agoOnce you make something a standard it is hard to get rid of it even if there is an obvious better approach. Mapping is explicitly regulated so no need for an indirect barrier. AFAIK it is the same other places. If a Chinese company wanted to do an extensive commercial map of the US it would face all sorts of regulative hurdles.