8 ms·
In the same way the Apple Watch doesn’t do anything better than an iPhone Wearables are not supposed to be an app or beat the iPhones processor. They’re suppos
by shmatt 2y ago
In the same way the Apple Watch doesn’t do anything better than an iPhone
Wearables are not supposed to be an app or beat the iPhones processor. They’re supposed to be small and always on
Would you wear an iPhone pro max on your lapel?
- csande17 2y agoThe Rabbit R1 is not a wearable device; you might be thinking of the Humane AI Pin.
- cdme 2y agoAnother unnecessary piece of hardware.
- filleduchaos 2y ago> In the same way the Apple Watch doesn’t do anything better than an iPhone I don't own an Apple Watch, but even my basic little Fitbit Charge has quite a few things it does way better than my phone (some of which my phone can't do at all, due to not actually having the required sensors). It's a little weird to me how common a sentiment this has been in all this. Do y'all not actually use the wearables that already exist? They all have something clear and useful that they do excellently compared to the weird little Android box that the r1 currently is - even little sleep rings like the Oura ring. And that's beside the fact that the r1 isn't even a wearable.
- prmoustache 2y agoThat is the thing. Not using the smartphone has a point when it propose better ergonomic. Having to carry and get another device out of your pocket is not better ergonomic. It would make sense not being just a smartphone app if the device was wearable or could be used hand free, it is not.