3 ms·
> we can achieve comparable performance to an in-memory database system for the cached working set Should I keep reading, or is the title misleading? The abs
by planckscnst 2y ago
> we can achieve
comparable performance to an in-memory database system for
the cached working set
Should I keep reading, or is the title misleading?
The abstract seems to say that the system provides memory-comparable performance for data that is... in-memory
- mattb314 2y agoThe idea is that memory-only data systems like HyPer are able to make design decisions that make them significantly faster that disk-based systems (eg postgres), even when the working set fits entirely within cache for the disk-based system. Umbra attempts to act like an in-memory DBMS when the working set fits in memory while degrading gracefully as the working set grows beyond memory. Agree the title doesn’t have enough detail to see this though.