3 ms·
Serious question, why not just use kubernetes instead of Nomad? The only “kinda cool”, thing I saw with Nomad is that it can “orchestrate” binary files, not ju
by hitpointdrew 2y ago
Serious question, why not just use kubernetes instead of Nomad?
The only “kinda cool”, thing I saw with Nomad is that it can “orchestrate” binary files, not just containers.
That said, putting binaries in containers isn’t very difficult.
- Axsuul 2y agoSame reason why you use Ruby instead of Java, Nomad has its own opinionated way of doing things that jives with a lot of people.
- amanzi 2y agoI like the single-binary approach that Nomad (and Consul) uses. Whereas, Kubernetes feels like a complicated web of services and APIs that need to work together. There's also a bunch of choices that need to be made up front when deploying Kubernetes to decide which distribution to use and which components you may or may not need. Kubernetes is a lot more flexible and powerful than Nomad, but Nomad is a lot easier to deploy and manage.
- hauleth 2y agoWhy use a knife when you can use our EveryThingCutter-9000 that requires a week of training to operate.