4 ms·
If the intention is to convince whistleblowers #3 through #30 that they should find a healthier hobby? Then yeah, they don't really care if it's obvious to the
by vandyswa 2y ago
If the intention is to convince whistleblowers #3 through #30 that they should find a healthier hobby? Then yeah, they don't really care if it's obvious to the peanut gallery, so long as it's obvious to any other witnesses.
- mulmen 2y agoDo you have any evidence whatsoever to suggest foul play here?
- mikrotikker 2y agoThe question is would U need evidence to shut your mouth if you were a Boeing whistleblower?
- mulmen 2y agoThat seems to presume the murder conspiracy theory. But if the conspiracy theory is effective in silencing whistleblowers then the murder is unnecessary. But if the murder didn’t happen the conspiracy theory is false then there was no reason for whistleblowers to be silent for fear of being killed. So this speculation in the absence of evidence serves the interest of corrupt corporations by undermining the confidence of whistleblowers.