For me the "year of the linux desktop" was 1995 To me it means "userable" not "the best for all applications" In 1995 it was already better than the alternati

For me the "year of the linux desktop" was 1995 To me it means "userable" not "the best for all applications" In 1995 it was already better than the alternatives, for my purposes. Very geeky, very personal. I have extensive experience with Mac OS (whatever it is called this year) and windows. For me Mac OS V. Gnome, of even Xface, it is a matter of taste. My taste is Linux Windows is still a mess, and keeps coming up with new mess as fast as it cleans up old mess