3 ms·
They are not banning them from using their AI tool. They're banning them from the currently-offered licensing structure. This is a profit-grab, not an ethical r
by edot 2y ago
They are not banning them from using their AI tool. They're banning them from the currently-offered licensing structure. This is a profit-grab, not an ethical restriction. It is of the same vein as Sam Altman going to congress and spooking them in hopes of regulating AI so that they are the only ones allowed to build it.
I wouldn't be shocked if we also saw a similar move to ban hospitals, schools, etc. from using the standard enterprise license under the guise of "we need to provide you with oversight for your vulnerable populations", and then charging them a hefty surcharge on top of the standard enterprise rate.
"Responsible" AI is more profitable than standard AI - regardless of the nebulous nature of what "responsible" means.
- jMyles 2y agoSpot on. I'll explore whether this nit is worth picking: > "Responsible" AI is more profitable than standard AI - regardless of the nebulous nature of what "responsible" means. /s/regardless of/in part owing to