I wasn't entirely clear from the article what it is that the suit is demanding. It seemed sort of like 2 different things: 1) to agree not to sue him for the

I wasn't entirely clear from the article what it is that the suit is demanding. It seemed sort of like 2 different things: 1) to agree not to sue him for the creation of the tool 2) To not block the tool from working The first one seems pretty reasonable. This kind of tool should be allowed to exist (and, honestly, shouldn't even require Meta's permission or approval, this should be legal-by-default). However, as much as such a tool seems like a good thing to me (that is, if I still used facebook at all), it doesn't seem reasonable to force Meta to not change their service to prevent it from working.