4 ms·
Why not Chrome, Safari, or Firefox?
by tfb 14y ago
Why not Chrome, Safari, or Firefox?
- zvrba 14y agoFirefox = bloat and I don't like it. Safari is affiliated with Apple and I won't touch products of a company whose products and way of running business are antithesis to openness, freedom and hacker culture. Chrome.. no special reason. I don't particularly like it, nothing I could point the finger at, but.. blah. Is there a way of disabling plugins in Chrome, as in: a placeholder is displayed on the page and the plugin is activated when I click the placeholder? IE, on the other hand, has "suggested sites" feature which I'd like to test more. Maybe it helps me with discovering some new content on the net.
- duaneb 14y ago> Is there a way of disabling plugins in Chrome, as in: a placeholder is displayed on the page and the plugin is activated when I click the placeholder? Yes, I use this all the time. it's built into the browser.
- ivanbernat 14y agoIt's not bloat that moved me away from FF, it's their lack of HTML5 video support on Mac, which makes it completely utterly useless.
- gcp 14y agoTo this I can only say "Huh"? Or do you mean they don't bundle patented codecs like H264? They support HTML5 video just fine AFAIK.
- wickedchicken 14y ago> Is there a way of disabling plugins in Chrome, as in: a placeholder is displayed on the page and the plugin is activated when I click the placeholder? Yes, via extensions and a native browser option