> I get your point, but it's going to be impossible to change anything and maintain every single person's workflow: A configurable OS is harder and more expens

> I get your point, but it's going to be impossible to change anything and maintain every single person's workflow: A configurable OS is harder and more expensive to maintain for MS and developers, so the trend is to reduce it in order to fit the 90% of the use cases and throw the 10% (arbitrary numbers) of workflows out. Can't really blame them, but just so people understand the frustrations of others.