2 ms·
> the UK has used it since 1974, so let's just assume that FT (an English language paper) is not worried about confusion Anyone aged around 60 or older would h
by peeters 2y ago
> the UK has used it since 1974, so let's just assume that FT (an English language paper) is not worried about confusion
Anyone aged around 60 or older would have been learning these numbers before 1974, and that's a significant overlap with FT's audience. You are dismissing this as if it's Middle English. It's an entirely reasonable explanation, at least one that shouldn't be dismissed.
- justin66 2y agoFair point.
- mywittyname 2y agoAnd there was a transition period where younger people need to know that the term could be ambiguous. It's not like they burned all the maths texts in 1974 and replaced them with newer literature. Older text books were probably in use into the 80s and perhaps the 90s. From the writing of the era, it's clear this new definition for million was not popular, and many chose to continue using the "British meaning." So it was probably in colloquial use for quite a while, and the transitional term "1 thousand million" became the proper style.