3 ms·
I'm not disputing your suggested date, but I can't find it anywhere in the article. Can you explain where you got it?
by TehCorwiz 2y ago
I'm not disputing your suggested date, but I can't find it anywhere in the article. Can you explain where you got it?
- adrian_b 2y agoThe article is new, only the tested CPU+GPU is from 2019. Snapdragon 855 was indeed the chipset used in most flagship Android smartphones of 2019. I have one in my ASUS ZenFone. Based on the big ARM cores that are included, it is easy to determine the manufacturing year of a flagship smartphone. The cheaper smartphones can continue to use older cores. Arm announces a core one year before it becomes used in smartphones. Cortex-A72 => 2016 Cortex-A73 => 2017 Cortex-A75 => 2018 Cortex-A76 => 2019 (like in the tested Snapdragon 855) Cortex-A77 => 2020 Cortex-X1 => 2021 Cortex-X2 => 2022 Cortex-X3 => 2023 Cortex-X4 => 2024
- jamesy0ung 2y agoI didn't realise the cores in the Pi 5 were 4 years old already. Surely if some vendor like qualcomm or mediatek released a sbc with decent software and recent cores, they could sweep the floor.
- nsteel 2y agoThey are 16nm, so yeh, "old". Newer tech means a newer node and considerably more expensive. At which point, why are you buying an SBC over some small intel/amd thing?
- TehCorwiz 2y agoOk. Cool, but the title makes it clear which one it's talking about. Usually when a date is added to the title it's in order to clarify when the article was published, not necessarily when the object of the article began to exist.