3 ms·
Might be a criminal or state behaviour, to chose exposure to germs as a method to hurt or kill someone. But that as far as we know is not corporate style. A ca
by a3w 2y ago
Might be a criminal or state behaviour, to chose exposure to germs as a method to hurt or kill someone.
But that as far as we know is not corporate style.
A car bomb, to deter other would-be whistleblowers, is more like the typical MO. As has happened with the original Panama Papers reporter on Malta.
- gjsman-1000 2y agoA. Who says they need to follow the MO? B. Plenty of killings that we know of do not follow your typical MO. For example, the killing of Litvinenko by polonium which can only be created in a nuclear reactor (still the most overkill death of a whistleblower ever known). C. In which case, is it possible you think that's the MO, because the others didn't get caught? And the corporations are now realizing a car bomb is too predictable?
- Findecanor 2y agoBTW, the previous whistleblower: John Barnett, had worked at the Material Review Segregation Area (MRSA) at the Boeing plant. If this is just a coincidence, it is a weird one.
- eli 2y agoHow could that possibly be anything other than a coincidence?
- ByThyGrace 2y ago"Let this be a message to all others in our department: no one messes with the MRSA".