2 ms·
I think you missed the nuance there. The hypothetical person supporting Israel has family in the country and is fearful of their family's safety. Wouldn't repl
by themaninthedark 2y ago
I think you missed the nuance there.
The hypothetical person supporting Israel has family in the country and is fearful of their family's safety. Wouldn't replying to them make you "Reply Guy"?
The parent of the conversation did not say that the artist was fearful, they said "enraged" or angry. It was posited in a child comment that the anger was out of a place of fear.
Depending on how you read the initial post, mood and priors, your reply to a comment can differ wildly.
- oytis 2y ago> Wouldn't replying to them make you "Reply Guy"? Why not? I think discretion is needed in both cases. I, for one, am rather pro-Israel, but I wouldn't necessarily tell that to a Palestinian sharing their anger online.