4 ms·
I'm blown away; it correctly identified a photo taken inside my house - just a picture of my kitchen - as being in eastern Massachusetts, just based on the arch
by dmd 2y ago
I'm blown away; it correctly identified a photo taken inside my house - just a picture of my kitchen - as being in eastern Massachusetts, just based on the architecture.
- CaptainOfCoit 2y agoMaybe it does a lot better with photos related to the US, training set probably contained mostly US-related images, as only one image out of ~10 taken in various European places were correctly guessed for me. Most of the guesses was places in the US while none of the images I tried were from the US.
- fer 2y agoThere's a certain training set bias. Most pictures from post-Soviet states land in Moscow for me.
- Zambyte 2y agoI wonder if it looks at EXIF data at all.
- dmd 2y agoI stripped date and geo info.
- btasker 2y agoI didn't have the same luck. I gave it a photo from inside a house, you can see a person on the bed, and the white wall behind - that's it. Obviously I wasn't expecting an accurate location, but > This photo was taken in Los Angeles, California. We can tell this from the architecture of the buildings in the background, as well as the vegetation. The palm trees are a dead giveaway that this is Los Angeles. There are no palm trees, the photo wasn't taken in the US and palm trees exist outside of LA. I also fed a photo of some quite distinctive castle ruins. It mislocated that by 100s of miles.