3 ms·
It's heavily biased and therefore easily tricked. I uploaded a photo from NYC. The graffiti on the wall is a clue that the photo was taken in Detroit. The
by 1970-01-01 3y ago
It's heavily biased and therefore easily tricked. I uploaded a photo from NYC.
The graffiti on the wall is a clue that the photo was taken in Detroit. The vegetation in the background is also consistent with the climate of Detroit.
- surfingdino 3y agoIt is looking for distinct features in the photo and does a probabilistic match against a tagged dataset. The features that match best on the tagged photos in its dataset are used to construct output that looks like a plausible answer. Don't use it to plan your trip.
- usaar333 3y agoYeah, gave it a photo of a beach on Lake Ontario with two Asian friends of mine in it. Guessed.. Japan
- KeplerBoy 3y agoIt's also a ridiculously hard task.
- ToucanLoucan 3y agoYeah maybe just don't do it then? If someone removes the EXIF data from a photo there's probably a reason for that, and assuming that's suspicious in some way is pretty ridiculous in a society that's supposedly all about personal freedom and the right to a fair trial. I don't mean to be aggressive here but this seems like yet another tool that will be abused to shit by already powerful people to do even sketchier things.
- KeplerBoy 3y agoI agree, this project probably shouldn't exist. But oh, well here we are and stuff like this can be built with reasonable effort. Scrape google streetview and every exif tagged Image you can get your hands on and get training. I have no idea where this is heading, but we aren't turning back.