4 ms·
I've used XMPP ~2 years ago and also set up my own server (prosody), it was a really good experience. Lightweight, Fast, reasonably secure way to chat with some
by SushiHippie 2y ago
I've used XMPP ~2 years ago and also set up my own server (prosody), it was a really good experience.
Lightweight, Fast, reasonably secure way to chat with some friends.
But I switched to Matrix a year later, not because I liked Matrix more, but because there was no one using XMPP besides me and some friends, everyone else (foss projects and maintainers) was on Matrix.
I really would love to use XMPP again, as prosody was a brease to set up, never made problems and was really lightweight compute and storage wise.
My Matrix homeserver (Synapse) uses 10x to 500x more RAM and CPU ( + the added CPU and RAM of my postgres istance) than prosody did, and its database is at least 10GB now (prosody used couple of MBs). Receiving and Sending via XMPP was also way faster than Matrix and large rooms on XMPP did not take 60+ seconds to load after you didn't check for a while.
- MattJ100 2y agoGlad to hear you had a good experience with Prosody! We're currently preparing a new major release. There's plenty of fun and cool stuff going on around XMPP, it's funny to see the comments from folk surprised whenever they hear snippets of news about it. I join several Matrix rooms via the Bifrost XMPP<>Matrix bridge (there is an instance run by matrix.org, and another by an XMPP community member which has some additional patches for various things at archon.im). Alternatively, Slidge (a self-hostable XMPP bridging project) now has support for connecting to a Matrix account via XMPP (what the Matrix folk would call "puppet bridging"). I haven't tried that one myself yet.