4 ms·
> Plug that into the fact that it doesn't work to kill someone after they have testified This way deters future whistleblowers. If they got rid of whistleblow
by xcv123 2y ago
> Plug that into the fact that it doesn't work to kill someone after they have testified
This way deters future whistleblowers.
If they got rid of whistleblowers before they blew the whistle, no one would hear about it. It would not be widely reported. Just another random employee who died.
- bandyaboot 2y agoWouldn’t they want to carry out their whistleblower deterrence operation before there were already 30 other whistleblowers?
- xcv123 2y agoGet rid of whistleblowers before they blow the whistle? So they just start killing random employees who look suspicious?
- bandyaboot 2y agoNo. If they were trying to accomplish what you were suggesting, you kill the first whistleblower early on to prevent others. That motive doesn’t make sense after there are already 30 whistleblowers.
- xcv123 2y agoTheir unpredictability makes it more terrifying to future whistleblowers.