2 ms·
> I thought the point of nosql was O(1) GET and UPDATE operations Tha was never the case. It would be silly to assume that given ultimately your GET and UPDATE
by chipdart 2y ago
> I thought the point of nosql was O(1) GET and UPDATE operations
Tha was never the case. It would be silly to assume that given ultimately your GET and UPDATE operations are inter-process requests which involve serialization/deserializarion, and most of the time even require at least a network call.
- tonymet 2y agonetwork, encode/decode are still constant in terms of the dataset size. Still O(1). O(1) doesn't mean "instant" it means "does not grow with the dataset"