4 ms·
seems very very hard to get right. non primary residences (and all other property) are already taxed at higher rate in Texas w/ our homestead exemptions. It's
by denimnerd42 2y ago
seems very very hard to get right. non primary residences (and all other property) are already taxed at higher rate in Texas w/ our homestead exemptions.
It's hard to say how discouraging capital from entering the market will decrease prices. If companies are willing to put up capital to rent homes that should theoretically increase the supply of residences available for rent. You could argue price fixing or other issues are at stake but it seems more complicated than a single line issue.
Typically single family homes aren't good targets for rental so we may see this whole experiment fail naturally. Many areas the math just doesn't work. The target price when this idea started was like a $200-250,000 home. There aren't many ways to get one of those right now. As you go up in price it's harder and harder to find a tenant that would prefer to rent.
I think Abbott is just trying to blow the wind in a different direction as one of the causes of real estate price explosion in big cities in Texas is due to migration of people due to corporate tax incentives he is behind which is a good thing for those that already own but bad for those that don't.
- jrs235 2y ago>non primary residences (and all other property) are already taxed at higher rate in Texas w/ our homestead exemptions. The question is how many folks are lying and claiming homestead when they shouldn't be? When they get caught what is the penalty for doing so? I recently read that Florida and neighboring states are sharing homestead informatoin and finding who's cheating on taxes (claim homestead when they shouldn't be). The question is, is the risk worht the reward for cheating? If the chance of getting caught is small, and the punishment for cheating isn't bad enough, people will continue to take their chances.