3 ms·
> this completely fails to explain the article's observed 3 TB sent vs 130 TB billed I interpreted that to be that their code was doing this over and over agai
by easton 2y ago
> this completely fails to explain the article's observed 3 TB sent vs 130 TB billed
I interpreted that to be that their code was doing this over and over again, so in total they retrieved 3TB over a set of requests. Still horrifying, but mildly more explainable.
- scottlamb 2y agoEven so, TCP windows generally don't start at the maximum size, so I'm really not buying that ratio of bytes ACKed to sent. One could disprove this explanation with a packet capture; just add the remaining window.