3 ms·
You're misreading in multiple ways, maybe in a rush to dunk on "Closed AI". Github Copilot is not the same as Copilot Chat which uses GPT-4, there still some u
by BoorishBears 3y ago
You're misreading in multiple ways, maybe in a rush to dunk on "Closed AI".
Github Copilot is not the same as Copilot Chat which uses GPT-4, there still some uncertainty on if Copilot completions use GPT-4 as outsiders know it (and iirc they've specifically said it doesn't at some point)
I also said Haiku is two massive steps behind Anthropic's offerings... which are Sonnet and Opus.
Anthropic isn't any more open than OpenAI, and I personally don't attribute any sort of virtue to any major corporation, so I'll take what works best
- Zambyte 3y agoI... don't think I misread you? Maybe you didn't mean what you wrote, but what you said was: > Github is likely using a GPT-4 class model which is two (massive) steps up in capabilities in Anthropic's offerings alone Comparing GPT-4 to Anthropics offerings, which, as you say, includes Sonnet and Opus. > Anthropic isn't any more open than OpenAI, [...] so I'll take what works best I understand that, and same here. I don't prefer Claude for any reason other than the quality of its output. I just think OpenAIs name is goofy with how they actually behave, so I prefer the more accurate derivative of their name :) Regarding what model Copilot Completions is using - point taken, I have no comment on that. My original comment in this thread was only meant to point out that open weight models are getting a lot better. Not saying they're using them.
- BoorishBears 3y agoI used "in Anthropic's capabilities" intentionally: it's two steps up in what they can do from Claude Haiku