3 ms·
It’s cheaper because not enough city housing is built and there are other costs associated with suburban living. IMO, property taxes should increase as density
by jwagenet 2y ago
It’s cheaper because not enough city housing is built and there are other costs associated with suburban living. IMO, property taxes should increase as density decreases because those less dense areas will cost a lot more to maintain roads, utilities, etc. down the road.
- weweweoo 2y agoHigher property taxes for less dense areas might make sense for suburbs of big cities, but not beyond that. In the countryside road and other infrastructure is required for agriculture, if some people also choose to live there (and that way reduce prices in cities) it's a win-win.
- Spivak 2y agoLook, where I live isn't SF or Vancouver that has the "NIMBYs oppose all new building" problem. If you wanted to build super dense high-rise apartments or skyscrapers both the city and state would throw money at you and give you tax breaks. It's still ludicrously expensive compared to even the closest suburb. We've gotten more traction building apartment complexes on the edges of the burbs than in the metro area in recent years.