3 ms·
The character design is. The image, however, is clearly Disney flavoured if not traced directly. His version, for example, does not have the distinctive bow. T
by astrodust 2y ago
The character design is. The image, however, is clearly Disney flavoured if not traced directly.
His version, for example, does not have the distinctive bow. The art style is also completely different.
- iainmerrick 2y agoTrue - it would be a good idea to use a Tenniel piece instead. Edit to add: I was mostly trying to push back on the implication that Disney owns Alice in Wonderland (and Peter Pan, Winnie the Pooh, etc). Now I re-read the original comment, they did specify "Disney-based", so maybe I'm over-reacting!