4 ms·
Siri is no longer seen as an AI assistant, at least not with the post-chatgpt meaning of the word 'AI'.
by thih9 3y ago
Siri is no longer seen as an AI assistant, at least not with the post-chatgpt meaning of the word 'AI'.
- cogman10 3y agoI agree, it is a looks problem. Capability wise, Siri and Google assistant do most of what rabbit did. They are well positioned to be able to expand every bit as quickly as rabbit can.
- brevitea 3y agoOne notable difference is that Apple and Google don't have your interaction data at the end of the day. Well, unless Rabbit sells it to them.
- marcinzm 3y agoYou do realize Google and Apple control 100% of the phone market, right? They don't need Rabbit's interaction data. They have their own. Their beta users probably provide more data than Rabbit's whole user base will.
- MichaelZuo 3y agoHuawei alone has >5%, and definitely at least a fifth of that install base is on harmonyos 4 which runs on a unique microkernel. So there's no way this is true. Google and Apple probably don't even control 95% circa Q1 2024.
- surajrmal 3y agoIsn't harmony os 4 still running their kernel side by side with Linux and ostensibly still using android? If harmony os next takes off that will be interesting.
- threeseed 3y agoWe are 6 weeks away from WWDC where Apple will be launching their new Siri. And we already know they are building a LAM for it. It’s likely one of the reasons Rabbit was rushed out the door.
- whoitwas 3y agoMaybe Siri isn't. I'm not even sure I've ever seen anyone use it successfully. I'm pretty sure Google's assistant was built using ML.
- VelesDude 3y agoYep, the meaning AI of is always changing. Search used to be considered AI because it could interpret human input.