3 ms·
Yes, I know. I'm asking why something that is sometimes sexualized the victim of censors? The face-value answer is obvious of course, in that the logic of somet
by vsnf 2y ago
Yes, I know. I'm asking why something that is sometimes sexualized the victim of censors? The face-value answer is obvious of course, in that the logic of something that is sexualized must be a sexual thing and therefore should be censored. But I'm making a broader point about the absurdity of the situation. Some people sexualize feet. So what, they're an objectively non-sexual, critical functional part of the body. And as was noted above, are often involved in various non-sexual ceremonies.
So, I guess my question remains the same. Feet are sometimes sexualized. So what?
- burnished 2y agoSo ask someone who cares? Sorry, I just really don't know what to tell you
- vsnf 2y agoI mean, in simple terms I guess I’m asking why mention it at all? A: What’s naughty about feet? B: they are sometimes sexualized. This doesn’t answer the question. I don’t see how it follows from one to the other. Sometimes hands are sexualized but hands are not naughty. Why do feet get special treatment here?