> If the source code originally used AGPL, isn’t it still contractually obligated to ensure those rights to its users, including any new source code added to it

> If the source code originally used AGPL, isn’t it still contractually obligated to ensure those rights to its users, including any new source code added to it? This guy really has no idea how copyright and licensing work. The AGPL places no obligation on the one distributing the original source code, it only places obligations on those who want to use or re-distirbute the code. There are no ifs, ands, or buts about this. If you don't understand such a fundamental point about licensing, you really really shouldn't be making a fool of yourself speaking about it in public.