2 ms·
The religion subject will likely trigger people sensitive to the subject, so side stepping that this points to a bigger problem: people assume that ai is object
by exabrial 3y ago
The religion subject will likely trigger people sensitive to the subject, so side stepping that this points to a bigger problem: people assume that ai is objective; I mean it’s in the name. The fact is we’ve seen how the maintainers exert great control over what is able to generate.
This is analogous to the early days on the internet where “I looked it up online” was a serious rebuttal and not a joke.
- 7bit 3y agoPeople assume that? I always found that extremely obvious. Any LLM imposes the moral and ethical worldview of its authors upon the people, which usually is heavily influenced by their culture.
- rcxdude 3y agoWell, a combination of that and its training data. base LLMs reflect the views in their training data, which is also heavily influenced by culture, and then the people training them usually try to adjust that with more carefully selected training data (with varying degrees of success: generally the result seems to be overly-cautious, but with still some substantial biases slipping through the cracks. See how much difference there is between image generators prompted with different genders).
- 7bit 2y agoNo, I'm not talking about the training data. I'm talking about restrictions set in place by their creators. Topics that give me warnings for violations against their terms of services.
- JohnFen 3y ago> I mean it’s in the name. I don't understand this comment. Where is it in the name?