You aren't. I've seen the debate a few times on HN, and I've had it with friends who also opt to use DuckDuckGo. It's "a bad name." It isn't evocative, it can'

You aren't. I've seen the debate a few times on HN, and I've had it with friends who also opt to use DuckDuckGo. It's "a bad name." It isn't evocative, it can't be (easily) made into a verb, and it lacks brevity. I don't really like the name, but I'm oddly comforted that I can shorten it to ddg (and use http://ddg.gg http://ddg.gg). I can deal for now, but I do think it should change.