4 ms·
In the situation described, I already charged lanes to avoid the toddler / deer / stopped car. The question is what I do about the incoming car I didn't notice
by grobbyy 2y ago
In the situation described, I already charged lanes to avoid the toddler / deer / stopped car.
The question is what I do about the incoming car I didn't notice.
A) change back and hit the toddler
B) do nothing, and have a fatal head-on collision
C) hit the brakes, and have a non-fatal head-on collision
D) speed up a little bit, so I can get back into my lane before the other car gets here
- jncfhnb 2y agoIf swerving into another lane to avoid a toddler rather than stopping is a “common” scenario, you already sound like a psychopathically reckless driver. In none of those situations should you be swerving into the wrong side of traffic. You should be stopping. And then, if necessary, carefully going into the other lane. Your examples are comically dangerous Edit: in fact, specifically you remind me of Richard Horne in twin peaks season 3: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=V62BJFn-BTQ https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=V62BJFn-BTQ
- foxyv 2y agoSo, you are driving in such a manner that you cannot stop in time for toddlers, deer, or broken down cars. Perhaps if you were driving slower you would not need to swerve into oncoming traffic to avoid road hazards?