3 ms·
Probably because public backlash would be insane. There is very little political or economic incentive to push something like that. It's kind of like banning a
by CivBase 2y ago
Probably because public backlash would be insane. There is very little political or economic incentive to push something like that.
It's kind of like banning alcohol. Yeah, it's bad for us (individually and collectively) but most of the population does it anyways and we're used to it. Taking that away would cause massive outrage.
- foxyv 2y agoI think the far more politically dangerous proposition is fighting with the automotive lobby. https://www.treehugger.com/big-surprise-car-industry-doesnt-idea-speed-governors-4852929 https://www.treehugger.com/big-surprise-car-industry-doesnt-...