3 ms·
I think it's more that the default seems backwards than the lack of ability to change it.
by zamadatix 3y ago
I think it's more that the default seems backwards than the lack of ability to change it.
- dsr_ 3y agoIt's three things: * here is a feature which we are defaulting to on * there's no persistent config for it * we know better than you do about your preferences
- zamadatix 3y ago"Defaulting to on" is just a symlink to an existing binary so that's not really much a problem.
- gpm 3y agoA symlink to a binary that I'm going to pass a password to seems like a security bug waiting to happen (just in the manner that any complexity around privilege escalation is a bad idea).