I think there always needs to be a distinction between "underdeveloped and unfinished" and "broken and insecure". I don't care if v0.1 is still lacking feature

I think there always needs to be a distinction between "underdeveloped and unfinished" and "broken and insecure". I don't care if v0.1 is still lacking features and the GUI is wonky. I'm usually fine with this being called "good enough". I care a lot if v0.1 crashes on launch, half the features in the release notes don't work (or even exist), and it leaks my passwords as plaintext. As a user this is never "good enough". In most conversations those both get lumped together in the move-fast-and-break-things mindset. Though to be fair, the original article is largely talking about the former.