5 ms·
kubernetes is dying, isn't it?
by anonymous_union 2y ago
kubernetes is dying, isn't it?
- lifty 2y agoYes, just like Linux.
- zbynek 2y agoLinux is dying? I though that year 2024 is the year of Linux on the desktop!
- 7thpower 2y agoNo it’s 2025, but definitely going to happen.
- bigstrat2003 2y agoSadly yes. Netcraft confirms it.
- vidarh 2y agoI just realised I've used Linux on the desktop for 30 years this year.
- nilamo 2y agoCommenting so I can see the replies later...
- dijit 2y agoKubernetes is a framework, it'll take a long time to die, it will likely contort itself into fitting whatever paradigm is needed. However, I wonder what you mean? Kubernetes from where I sit has almost complete ubiquity across most companies. Even in places where it's a poor fit.
- vidarh 2y agoPeople starting to put abstractions over it means a) there's a chance people will start asking for a given abstraction rather than Kubernetes, and not care if that abstraction eventually subsumes or replaces Kubernetes, b) at least some people think Kubernetes is enough of a nuisance to deal with to be looking for alternatives. Whether that means Kubernetes is dying, I'm not so sure. But Kubernetes is extremely complex for a lot of workloads that it's total overkill for, so I'm not surprised people are looking for options.
- remram 2y agoI'm not sure what in the article makes you say that? Anyway, the answer is no.
- kobalsky 2y agoCould you explain how you arrive to that conclusion from seeing some proyect offering an alternative autoscaling engine? The only issue I have with the default HorizontalPodAutoscaler is that I cannot scale down to 0 when some processing queues are empty. Other than that, we have shrines erected to k8s.