2 ms·

hm the headline says "zero cost" .. so that infers an emphasis on networked identity, record keeping and making costs for infringement (?) over taking in money,

hm the headline says "zero cost" .. so that infers an emphasis on networked identity, record keeping and making costs for infringement (?) over taking in money, administering limited-use licenses and distribution of proceeds.. computer networks are very amenable to constant status checks and trivial "you can get it or you can't, right now" .. It would probably take some time to really think through the actual proposal, so take this as off-the-cuff..

wrs 3y ago
So far these licenses have been something like “if you have more than X revenue or Y employees you have to pay”. There’s no way to automate that, just like there’s no way to automate “if someone in your venue plays this song, you have to pay” (I’m talking about writer/publisher royalties for live performance here, not streams). And enforcement is expensive, and a cost center, and enforcing the long tail just ends up not happening. This will presumably be more sophisticated since it’s for paying computer-savvy folks, but ASCAP is still accepting cue sheets for video on paper and Excel. [0] [0] https://www.ascap.com/help/royalties-and-payment/cue-sheets https://www.ascap.com/help/royalties-and-payment/cue-sheets