2 ms·
Interestingly enough, this is a very similar type list as you'd see for Mongo, especially in terms of overall effort. That you'd encounter all these things at
by mrkurt 14y ago
Interestingly enough, this is a very similar type list as you'd see for Mongo, especially in terms of overall effort.
That you'd encounter all these things at a 25mm daily ops level is pretty odd, though.
- rogerbinns 14y agoThe very same folks did write about their MongoDB experience: http://blog.engineering.kiip.me/post/20988881092/a-year-with-mongodb http://blog.engineering.kiip.me/post/20988881092/a-year-with...
- jasonmccay 14y agoI think the point he was making was that the company in question never tried to scale horizontally with MongoDB because, in their words, "we believe horizontally scaling shouldn’t be necessary for the relatively small amount of ops per second we were sending to MongoDB." Yet, they went and scaled horizontally with Riak and experienced pain. Their opinion that it did not make sense to have to horizontally scale the "relatively small" number of ops they were sending to MongoDB is certainly their own, but then they horizontally scaled with Riak anyway and boasted about their 25MM ops per day scaling ... which, averaged out, is only about 280 ops per second. In short, it was far from an apples to apples comparison.
- tptacek 14y agoIt's probably significantly more than 280 ops/sec, given peak times.