3 ms·
There's a George Hotz lecture somewhere where he evicerates the Robotaxi business model. Essentially he makes the point that, if you have to own a fleet and ma
by mushufasa 2y ago
There's a George Hotz lecture somewhere where he evicerates the Robotaxi business model.
Essentially he makes the point that, if you have to own a fleet and maintain it, even if you stop paying driver's wages, you're not making profit compared to market rates for Uber drivers. Sad implication is that uber drivers themselves are underwater after taking into account depreciation and maintenance.
A fleet where Tesla operates a network without needing to own or maintain the capital equipment is a lot more profitable, and they're one of the few companies positioned to pull it off (certainly not Waymo). Essentially, Tesla could make money on the vehicle sale, make money on the maintenance, and make a platform fee on the taxi network. Wonderful economics on paper.
Win-win too: the car-owners supply the capital and in return receive the freedom of their own car plus an offset to their depreciation via the rental cash flow. That would mean that teslas would have incredible resale value compared to 'dumb' cars that don't produce cashflow.
That said, trust in the network is key, and Tesla + Musk aren't exactly winning public trust recently. If this is going to work, each incremental rider needs to be able to trust that
- if they try to book a Tesla robotaxi they will be able to find one available, nearby and in the time they want it
- the car will work (well maintained, enough charge for their trip duration)
- the self-driving will be safe
While all those things are straightforward, to be honest, it's hard for me to imagine how they can provide a better value proposition than human Uber/Lyft in that regard, where in major cities a car is always 10 min away or less, and the driver has both a financial and survival interest in ensuring it's well maintained and safe (the driver's life also depends on it).
Maybe the niche will be suburban or exurban places where human ride shares don't have enough demand to efficiently match with supply, and where people are okay waiting / planning in advance if they're sure a car will come. Could be some overlap with starlink market fit.
- candiodari 2y agoThis one? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nnh5TQ60hek https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nnh5TQ60hek
- jqpabc123 2y agoMaybe Musk doesn't really care if robotaxis is a viable business plan or not. Maybe he is just looking for something, anything to give the stock price a jolt and help encourage investors to flat out give him $56B.
- maxerickson 2y agoWaymo is a lot closer to having a working technology package than Tesla. They could do something wild like partner with manufacturers if they decided that wide deployment onto consumer cars was a good path.
- panarky 2y ago> you're not making profit compared to market rates for Uber drivers Your implicit assumption is that robotaxis are competing on price with Uber drivers in their personally owned cars. But as we can see today with fully autonomous Waymo cars, this is positioned as a premium product, with premium pricing, significantly higher than Uber X. If I have a choice between Waymo, Uber and Lyft, I'd eagerly pay twice the rideshare rate for the consistently high-quality experience and predictable comfort, safety, and distraction-free ride that Waymo offers. With Uber, I never know what I'm going to get.