4 ms·
You are also atill going to crash if you break automatically in that scenario... i dont get your point
by DontchaKnowit 2y ago
You are also atill going to crash if you break automatically in that scenario... i dont get your point
- ckdarby 2y agoNo, the system could always maintain the correct distance to be able to break given your speed and the speed of the car in front of you or maintain that the crash will never exceed X speed based upon stats of the vehicle of survival rates. As another commenter said, even reducing 10km more than a human will reduce the consequences.
- Retric 2y agoNot all collisions are equivalent. Suppose you and the car in front of you collided a fraction of a second later when both are doing 10MPH less, that alone removes a great deal of energy and thus risk. You may avoid whatever the first person was trying to avoid hitting or spinning into the next lain etc.
- DontchaKnowit 2y agoOkay fine, but youve now introduced a whole class of accidents (false positive caused wrecks) that didnt exist before.
- Retric 2y agoYou also eliminate an accidents where the system prevents a collision. Insurance companies pay attention to the total risk and it’s a clear benefit.