Rabbit's UX use cases are not novel enough. AI Pin seems to be a little less complete, but at least the innovation in the direction of combining software and ha

Rabbit's UX use cases are not novel enough. AI Pin seems to be a little less complete, but at least the innovation in the direction of combining software and hardware is worthy of recognition. As for Rabbit, it completely imitates the ideas of Google Assistant and Lens. From an industrial perspective, look at Apple's headset, even if the experience is not there yet, the entire industrial design and integration level are very amazing. But Rabbit, which looks like a college student's graduation project, is actually very easy to complete with ESP32 at its core. If this esp32 is combined with groq, maybe the experience will be even better. I think this project itself has a lot to do with teenage engineering. The success of TE (low tech, high marketing) gave them inspiration. In terms of musicality, TE is far behind, for example, Elektron, which is also from Sweden, not to mention the master of analog sound by companies such as Moog. TE may only have a very impressive hardware innovation in TP7 (which is not so popular). As for other popular pocket operators, KO2, and OP1, there are too few hardcore innovations, and hype and trend culture have the upper hand. With that being said, looking at the sales of Moog and the outcome of its acquisition, it must be admitted that marketing is still very important. But musical instruments are different from mass-market commodities. After all, the former can be collected and one does not have to consider their practicality too much. Now the easy access of AI service at the backend will obviously lead to more and more low tech, which is normal and just a phenomenon. But I will give more praise to hard-core innovation. If there is hard-core innovation and excellent UX use cases, it will be icing on the cake.