4 ms·
What's controversial here? The benefits of Vitamin D is pretty well established ( it's a "vital mineral" after all.) I read the summary and didn't see anythin
by leggomuhgreggo 2y ago
What's controversial here? The benefits of Vitamin D is pretty well established
( it's a "vital mineral" after all.)
I read the summary and didn't see anything very adventurous.
- fylham 2y agoSure, it is vital, but he claims that lack of vitamin D underlies nearly all diseases of modernity, which isn’t well-established. Meanwhile he was making money selling vitamin D and not disclosing it, which makes his motivation seem suspect. It’s very easy for bias to obliterate the validity of research.