3 ms·

With a staggered layout the right hand digits align with the columns and the left hand does the opposite; it's at nearly a 90 degree angle! So if you believe wr

With a staggered layout the right hand digits align with the columns and the left hand does the opposite; it's at nearly a 90 degree angle! So if you believe wrist angle follows the keys then staggered would be far worse. I don't think wrist angle follows the keys. You simply move your hands and fingers to hit the proper key regardless of wrist angle. No alignment necessary. So then the benefit of ortho becomes the ability to judge the placement of the keys better by feel, particularly the top row. (And it has the side benefit of allowing you to map a numpad over the keys more naturally, which is particularly attractive to me.)

weinzierl 2y ago
This is only if you stick religiously to the finger placement that is classically taught and which was invented in the age of mechanical typewriters. For these staggering was a necessity to prevent the typebars from clashing. The keys had a long travel and had to be hit with a lot of force from above like a diving eagle. Resting the palm was impossible and for a floating hand a short travel from key to key was more important than the angle. A 2016 study[1] showed that consistency (always same finger for the same key) is a better predictor for typing performance than using a traditional 10-finger system or even ten fingers at all. Also the finger placement taught varies from where it is taught. My point is that staggering doesn't make sense for a split keyboard and that most people unconsciously use the staggering of their regular keyboard as a poor replacement for a true split. [1] https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2858036.2858233 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2858036.2858233 EDIT: "I don't think wrist angle follows the keys. You simply move your hands" "minimal global hand motion" was the third best predictor for typing performance in the paper mentioned above. Unless you are typing on a Remington, anchor your palms and only move your fingers. Good for performance and good for your health.

weinzierl 2y ago

This is only if you stick religiously to the finger placement that is classically taught and which was invented in the age of mechanical typewriters. For these staggering was a necessity to prevent the typebars from clashing. The keys had a long travel and had to be hit with a lot of force from above like a diving eagle. Resting the palm was impossible and for a floating hand a short travel from key to key was more important than the angle. A 2016 study[1] showed that consistency (always same finger for the same key) is a better predictor for typing performance than using a traditional 10-finger system or even ten fingers at all. Also the finger placement taught varies from where it is taught. My point is that staggering doesn't make sense for a split keyboard and that most people unconsciously use the staggering of their regular keyboard as a poor replacement for a true split. [1] https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2858036.2858233 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2858036.2858233 EDIT: "I don't think wrist angle follows the keys. You simply move your hands" "minimal global hand motion" was the third best predictor for typing performance in the paper mentioned above. Unless you are typing on a Remington, anchor your palms and only move your fingers. Good for performance and good for your health.