I think it's telling that rather than address any of Nina's very detailed analysis, you launch an ad hominem attack. Also, by your logic, almost all journalist

I think it's telling that rather than address any of Nina's very detailed analysis, you launch an ad hominem attack. Also, by your logic, almost all journalists (except those who happen to have a PhD in the relevant science) should be ignored. Is that what you believe? I don't know anyone with a backyard capable of feeding their entire family. Do you?