4 ms·
So the source you're using to rebut a Stanford nutrition study is someone whose most relevant education is a Masters degree in Latin American studies? And the
by the_gastropod 2y ago
So the source you're using to rebut a Stanford nutrition study is someone whose most relevant education is a Masters degree in Latin American studies?
And the people suggesting eating more foods you can literally grow yourself in your backyard are corrupted business scientists? Make it make sense.
- hilux 2y agoI think it's telling that rather than address any of Nina's very detailed analysis, you launch an ad hominem attack. Also, by your logic, almost all journalists (except those who happen to have a PhD in the relevant science) should be ignored. Is that what you believe? I don't know anyone with a backyard capable of feeding their entire family. Do you?