2 ms·
> This wasn't what your parent comment claimed I was responding to your comment, not my own parent comment. You used the word “privacy”. TikTok is clearly wors
by blackeyeblitzar 3y ago
> This wasn't what your parent comment claimed
I was responding to your comment, not my own parent comment. You used the word “privacy”. TikTok is clearly worse on privacy, and the link I shared is an example of that.
> I guess then you can speculate and make wild claim you want about it then - why stop there?
If your argument is nothing should be done because a company controlled by an adversarial government is hard to examine, then that’s not very convincing. Like I said, with what evidence is possible to collect, it shows that TikTok is highly skewed in an artificial and likely malicious way.
> Now that I understand you're completely unserious, I can move on with my day
From https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html: * Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.*
- JohnMakin 3y agoI’m not making any argument. I’m purely responding to what you said, which is blatant misinformation not backed by any evidence. > Like I said, with what evidence is possible to collect, it shows that TikTok is highly skewed in an artificial and likely malicious way. Can you show such evidence? I’m genuinely curious. Such evidence would make top headlines, so I’m a little skeptical, but maybe you know something more than I do other than “China is bad.”