3 ms·
Yes, but that doesn't change the setup. They had a separate antenna and a separate server making separate copies of the shows for each user. But, even after th
by sp332 2y ago
Yes, but that doesn't change the setup. They had a separate antenna and a separate server making separate copies of the shows for each user.
But, even after the Supreme Court said they were operating more like a cable company https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/06/supreme-court-puts-aereo-out-of-business/?comments=1&comments-page=1 https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/06/supreme-court-pu... they were not allowed to actually operate like a cable company. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/10/in-win-for-broadcasters-court-shuts-down-aereos-live-tv-feature/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/10/in-win-for-broad...
- AnthonyMouse 2y agoSounds like they had bad lawyers (or bad judges). Shouldn't be simultaneously possible to be a cable company and not. But as IA isn't to my knowledge doing controlled digital lending with broadcast television, is there any plausible argument they would be found to be a cable company?
- paulmd 2y agoIA is doing a whole lot of digital lending other than television and that’s part of what this lawsuit is about iirc.