Also NAL, but the "safe harbor" laws[1] explicity state that "a service provider monitoring its service or affirmatively seeking facts indicating infringing act

Also NAL, but the "safe harbor" laws[1] explicity state that "a service provider monitoring its service or affirmatively seeking facts indicating infringing activity"[2] is not required for protection. I have no idea how that translates to judicial precedent though. [1]: https://www.copyright.gov/512/ https://www.copyright.gov/512/ [2]: https://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html#512 https://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html#512